Outmanned Ukrainian forces held on to their capital, Kyiv, after resisting an overnight onslaught that included explosions and bursts of gunfire. As fighting receded during daylight hours, the city remained in government hands. Authorities imposed a 5 p.m. curfew and air raid sirens could be heard as night fell Saturday evening.
Ukrainians who ventured outside in the afternoon found a city transformed by war. There were sandbags in the streets, burned-out cars, and lines at sites distributing guns. The metro had stopped running, its stations now used solely as underground bunkers.
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky posted a video of himself at daybreak Saturday, unshaven, on the capital’s streets, appearing resolved to remain in Kyiv even as Western officials warned that Russia plans to capture or kill him.
Ukraine’s health minister said that a total of 198 Ukrainians have been killed in the fighting, up from 137 a day earlier, with more than 1,000 wounded. There were already signs of a mass exodus — the United Nations said Saturday that more than 150,000 Ukrainian refugees have fled the country.
Here’s what to know
- On Saturday morning, a high-rise apartment building near one of Kyiv’s international airports was struck by a missile as air raids continued. A residential building in Kyiv was hit on Friday morning.
- Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Romania, Poland, Bulgaria and the Czech Republic have moved to shut their airspace to Russian airlines. Estonia’s prime minister called on all E.U. countries to do the same.
- A senior Western security official said two Russian IL-76 transport planes were shot down outside Kyiv late Friday night by Ukrainians. The official did not know whether Russian personnel were killed. The British Ministry of Defense says Russia has “yet to gain control of the airspace over Ukraine, greatly reducing the effectiveness of the Russian Air Force.”
UNDERSTANDING THE RUSSIA-UKRAINE CONFLICT
Map: Russian attacks on third day of invasion
Outnumbered Ukrainian forces continued to counter Russian attacks on their capital Kyiv early Saturday after hours of street fighting overnight. Earlier, Russian forces captured the Chernobyl nuclear power plant site, as well as Snake Island on the Black Sea.
Social media companies push Ukrainian users to add safeguards
A young man posted a live stream to TikTok while sheltering underground during an air raid on Thursday. In Russia, antiwar protesters posted images and videos of gathering crowds to Twitter. And massive open Telegram groups have filled with first-person updates, worries and chatter from residents of cities under siege.
These kinds of posts have flooded in since Russia launched its attack on Ukraine this week. Most of the accounts don’t belong to professional journalists or activists, but to people coping with a traumatic situation or to make their opposition heard. That means most people may not have the security experience or knowledge to protect their identities or location. Without the right settings, a simple social media update could expose people to Russian military intelligence and they could be targeted for retaliation, either online or in real life.
It’s a worst-case scenario that social media companies are all too familiar with from other conflicts around the world and even protests in the United States.
In the past few days, some major tech companies have announced ways to help Ukrainians and others protect and even delete their accounts. Google on Friday tweeted that it had automatically increased security protections for people with Google accounts in the area. Google’s announcement came after Twitter ran down the basic precautions people in conflict zones should take when posting online in a thread earlier in the week.Facebook’s head of security policy, Nathaniel Gleicher, said on Thursday the service had turned on a new feature in Ukraine that lets people lock their accounts by turning on certain privacy settings.
Campaigns to boycott Russian-made goods build momentum
As the Russian invasion of Ukraine entered a third day on Saturday, calls on social media grew louder for a boycott of Russia and its goods, as an act of solidarity with the Ukrainian people.
In Canada, liquor stores in the province of Newfoundland and Labrador announced Friday that they would stop selling Russian spirits.
The Newfoundland Labrador Liquor Corporation, which is responsible for importing, selling and distributing alcohol within the province, announced on Twitter that it would “remove products of Russian origin from its shelves,” adding: “These include Russian Standard Vodka and Russian Standard Platinum Vodka.”
Some Canadian consumers welcomed the move, praising it as an “excellent decision” on Twitter, while others were more skeptical. “What is this gonna do?” one critic posted. “NL Liquor and other liquor boards have already bought and paid for the products. It is not going to hurt them one bit.”
Chelsea owner Roman Abramovich gives up control of his team amid Russian invasion
Chelsea FC owner Roman Abramovich released a statement on Saturday stating that he was giving up control of the team. Abramovich, while ceasing control of the team, didn’t indicate that he planned to sell the team.
Statement from Club Owner Roman Abramovich.
— Chelsea FC (@ChelseaFC) February 26, 2022
His announcement comes after members of British Parliament encouraged him to give up his assets, including the British soccer club. Abramovich, a Russian businessman who has owned the team since 2003, has been a supporter of Russian President Vladimir Putin and could be making the move to protect the club from potential sanctions brought down against him.
“I have always taken decisions with the Club’s best interest at heart,” Abramovich said in the statement. “I remain committed to these values. That is why I am today giving trustees of Chelsea’s charitable Foundation the stewardship and care of Chelsea FC. I believe that currently they are in the best position to look after the interests of the Club, players, staff, and fans.”
After Russia’s invasion of Ukraine earlier this week, the United States, Great Britain and the European Union issued retaliatory sanctions against Russia. Abramovich, who has ties to Putin and is known for his exploits in Western jurisdictions, is seen as someone who could be targeted.
Missiles strike ships in the Black Sea, Ukrainian company says
A cargo ship and an oil tanker off the southern tip of Ukraine in the Black Sea were struck by missiles Friday, sparking fires, a Ukrainian shipping company said.
At about 12:10 p.m. local time, missiles hit the bunker of the Moldovan-registered vessel Millennium Spirit, according to a statement from Vladimir Ivantsov, manager of Stark Shipping Ukraine.
The ship was targeted, Ivantsov said, because it was carrying about 600 metric tons of fuel for Ukrainian forces.
Two members of the 10-person crew were seriously injured, Ivantsov said.
Less than an hour later, Ivantsov said, a rocket hit the stern of the Panamanian-registered vessel Namura Queen. The ship had been on its way to load grain at a port near Odessa when the missile struck, he said.
Ukrainian Ambassador to the United States Oksana Markarova confirmed to reporters Saturday that Ukraine attributes the attacks on both ships to Russia. She called it “a flagrant violation of the international law of the sea.”
As Russia moves to cut off access to Twitter, pressure mounts on major tech companies to take tougher line
We’re aware that Twitter is being restricted for some people in Russia and are working to keep our service safe and accessible.
— Twitter Support (@TwitterSupport) February 26, 2022
With Ukraine’s capital under siege, major tech companies are coming under mounting pressure to use their influence over the world’s most popular phones, apps and social media platforms to take action against Russia.
Russia’s Internet censor also escalated pressure on the tech companies, as protesters used social media to voice opposition to the war and organize. A Twitter corporate account on Saturday tweeted that the service was being “restricted for some people in Russia.”
Tech companies have long positioned themselves as beacons of free expression and democratic standards.
But the war in Ukraine is testing those values in new ways. From the halls of Congress to the Twitter feeds of pro-Ukrainian activists, the companies are facing increasing calls for a tougher line on Russia, which itself is known for using popular technology to influence geopolitics — most infamously in the 2016 U.S. presidential election.
Zelensky vows to ‘fight as long as it takes,’ praises prospect of using banking sanctions against Russia
In a message meant to bolster strength and solidarity in the face of Russian invasion, Zelensky on Saturday praised his fellow citizens for being willing to defend their nation and vowed to fight “for as long as it takes to liberate the country.”
“The world has seen that Ukrainians are powerful. Ukrainians are brave. Ukrainians are on their native land and will never surrender it,” Zelensky said in a video shared on the messaging app Telegram. “If babies are already being born in shelters, even as shelling continues, then the enemy has no chance in this, undeniably, people’s war.”
The onetime comedian turned president, Zeleksny has thus far remained in the capital of Kyiv despite telling Ukrainians he is Russia’s “Target No. 1,” refusing U.S. efforts to evacuate him and his family to safety.
On Saturday, Zelensky says that he spoke “every hour” with world leaders — those he called “friends” of Ukraine, including Italy and India, the latter which he said gives its “full support.”
He also voiced support for the prospect that European allies could cut Russia off from the Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication, the bank messaging network known as SWIFT. The sanction would be a severe blow to Russia, but it remains a controversial move because of the effects it could have on other European economies.
On Saturday, German officials who had long been holdouts of using SWIFT to sanction Russia signaled openness to the move if done in a “targeted” manner.
“Our diplomats fought days-long and inspiringly, so that all European countries agreed to this very strong and just decision, to cut off Russia from the international interbank network,” Zelensky said, who underscored SWIFT’s importance to Russia. “We have this very important victory — this is billions and billions of losses for the Russia, a concrete price for this despicable invasion into our country.”
British politicians urge government to “rip up bureaucracy” and “make it easy” for fleeing Ukrainians
LONDON — British lawmakers Saturday urged the government to do more to offer safe passage for people fleeing Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.
Unlike some other countries, Britain has not offered to waive its current rules to take in Ukrainian refugees.
Julian Smith, a senior member of the ruling Conservative Party, urged the government to “rip up” the bureaucracy. “Let’s just say they are welcome & we will make it as easy as possible to be here,” he said on Twitter.
Yvette Cooper, a politician for the opposition Labour Party also tweeted that even though Ukraine is “under fire,” Britain’s Home Office “still applies normal visa restrictions inc salaries, language, close relatives.”
“This isn’t solidarity w Ukraine, it’s immoral,” she said.
Yasmin Qureshi, a Labour politician whose constituency has an active Ukrainian community, told the Washington Post that “Ukraine nationals don’t need a visa to come to Ireland and I think we should do the same.”
“We say, ‘we need to help people.’ Well, this is a practical way of helping people,” Qureshi said.
Polls show that a majority of Brits believe that their country should take in Ukrainian refugees.
Many on social media criticized the Home Office office for “gesture politics” after it tweeted a video of the Ukrainian flag flying above its building along with the hashtag #StandWithUkraine.
Map: Latest ground advances of Russia into Ukraine
Russian troops have moved into Ukraine from the north, south and east of the country. Russian forces entered Ukraine through a ground incursion from Belarus toward Kyiv. According to the Pentagon, Russia is facing more resistance in the capital than what it was expecting.
Across Russia, arrests continue, as protesters get creative trying to dodge police
MOSCOW — Spontaneous mass protests are illegal in Russia, so people across the country got creative Saturday, pouring out their opposition to a war that has shocked liberals and unsettled its comfortable urban class.
Some mounted individual pickets, holding antiwar posters while standing alone on a street outside Russia’s lower house of parliament in Moscow and in city squares around Russia — the only form of protest that was legal until March 2020 when authorities ruled even that out because of the pandemic.
Others adopted the strength-in-numbers philosophy: Hundreds marched in Yekaterinburg chanting “No to war!” according to the Telegram channel Avtozak Live.
And others played a game of cat and mouse with police. Instead of massing in one place — difficult in Moscow or St. Petersburg, given the massive deployments of riot police — many protests were smaller, some just a few dozen people, moving from place to place to avoid arrest.
Even so, more than 325 protesters were arrested in 30 cities and towns across Russia on Saturday, almost half of them in Moscow, according to the rights group OVD-Info. In the three days since the invasion of Ukraine began, more than 2,776 people have been arrested in protests across the country.
One group of anonymous St. Petersburg protesters donned skull masks and hoodies to mount a demonstration in a cemetery, carrying placards with slogans, “Don’t they have enough bodies” and “There are no patriots among the dead,” the Vot Tak news website reported.
Instead of holding a poster, artist Anzhela Aganina wore a traditional Ukrainian shirt and stood in a Moscow street, severed blonde braids and flowers arranged at her feet, according to online news site SotaVision.
In St. Petersburg, police led away one young woman carrying a black tote bag with the words “No war,” the site reported.
Is the U.K. finally cracking down on dodgy Russian money?
LONDON — When Boris Johnson announced in Parliament this week “the largest and most severe package of economic sanctions that Russia has ever seen,” the British prime minister made a boast that drew guffaws.
“Oligarchs in London,” Johnson declared, “will have nowhere to hide.”
Except in plain sight, it appears.
Russian money is so ubiquitous, so notorious in Britain’s capital city that the global financial hub was long ago nicknamed “Londongrad.”
It is an old joke, but not so funny to anti-corruption crusaders, kleptocracy tour operators and frustrated lawmakers, who have watched as post-Soviet elites with ties to the Kremlin snap up London townhouses and English estates, often bought anonymously through shell companies, with the profits generated by Russia’s version of crony capitalism.
And even as the ferocity of Russia’s attack in Ukraine produces shock and outrage in Britain, there is skepticism about how much will change here. Previous Conservative Party governments have promised to clamp down on dirty money in London, with little impact.
Germany will send weaponry to Ukraine, a major shift that could help Kyiv resist Russia
Germany on Saturday announced plans to send 1,000 antitank weapons and 500 Stinger missiles to Ukraine, a major shift in post-World War II German defense policy that marked a significant escalation in Europe’s military support for Kyiv.
“The Russian invasion marks the turning of an era. It is our duty to support Ukraine to the best of our ability in defending against Putin’s invading army,” German Chancellor Olaf Scholz said in a statement.
The decision was a significant reversal after months of foot-dragging from Berlin about military support for Ukraine. Until Saturday, German leaders had refused to send lethal weaponry and had also blocked other countries from doing so with German-made armaments. Under pressure, they earlier agreed to send helmets and a field hospital, a decision for which they were mocked.
Germany has rarely sent weapons into conflicts, a long-standing political taboo that is related to its guilt over World War II. (Detractors note that the German defense industry has nevertheless sold extensive armaments to authoritarian leaders around the world.) The country has been especially cautious about sending weapons that would be used against Russia, one of the Nazi regime’s World War II-era opponents and a country that many Germans partly credit for their liberation.
That meant that Saturday’s move was especially notable. It could open a flood of German-made armaments from other countries to Ukraine as well. Earlier in the day, the country had already signed off on the Netherlands sending 400 German-made rocket-propelled grenade launchers to Kyiv.
The 400 RPG launchers are currently owned by the Dutch government but were manufactured in Germany; when Germany sells or transfers its weaponry to other countries, it retains control over whether those arms get moved elsewhere.
What is SWIFT and why does it matter in the Russia-Ukraine war?
One of the first serious points of division among Western nations on Russian sanctions in the Ukraine crisis is whether Russian financial institutions should be cut off from a global messaging system known as SWIFT.
More than two dozen nations have agreed to impose sanctions but have not united around this latest proposal, which the French finance minister called a “financial nuclear weapon.”
Here’s what you need to know about SWIFT and the debate about whether to pressure the network to exclude Russian financial institutions.
Germany says it is open to cutting Russia off from SWIFT mechanism in ‘targeted’ manner
The German government said Saturday that it supports cutting off Russia from a key financial transactions mechanism in a “targeted and functional” way, marking a possible breakthrough for governments that had urged Berlin to back more decisive action against Moscow.
In a statement, Foreign Minister Annalena Baerbock and Economy and Climate Minister Minister Robert Habeck said they were working to determine how “the collateral damage of a SWIFT decoupling can be limited in a way that it hits the right targets.”
It remained unclear on Saturday how such a targeted decoupling would look — and whether Germany would back less-targeted measures if the plans cannot be implemented in the way it is hoping for.
Germany, the European Union’s biggest economy, has strong trade ties with Russia and heavily depends on its supply of natural gas. It had been a key skeptic of cutting Russia off from SWIFT — a move French Finance Minister Bruno Le Maire called a “financial nuclear weapon” on Friday.
SWIFT — short for the Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication — is a messaging network connecting banks around the world. The Belgian-based consortium links more than 11,000 financial institutions operating in more than 200 countries and territories, acting as a critical hub enabling international payments.
Italy, which had also been reluctant to back a SWIFT cutoff, appeared to change course earlier on Saturday, saying that it is now also open to such a move.
British Prime Minister Boris Johnson has been among the biggest supporters of such a measure, the Financial Times reported Thursday. France has also become increasingly vocal in its support.
Ukraine’s Foreign Minister Dmytro Kuleba said Friday he had pressed Secretary of State Antony Blinken “to use all US influence on some hesitant European countries to ban Russia from SWIFT.”